April 2010 (#173):

• Mailbag
• 2-Cent Tips
• News Bytes, by Deividson Luiz Okopnik and Howard Dyckoff
• Magic and Mayhem, by Anonymous
• Linux's problem with Simplified Chinese, by Silas Brown
• Away Mission - Recommended for April, by Howard Dyckoff
• Pixie Chronicles: Part 1 Lessons from Mistakes, by Henry Grebler
• Yes, Master, by Henry Grebler
• Codeweavers vs. Cedega, Commercial Wine Product Comparison, by Jeff Hoogland
• Quick and Dirty Web Filtering on Linux, by Anderson Silva
• Picking Fruit, by Ken Starks
• XKCD, by Randall Munroe
• Doomed to Obscurity, by Pete Trbovich
• The Linux Launderette

Mailbag

This month's answers created by:

[ Anderson Silva, Steve 'Ashcrow' Milner, Amit Kumar Saha, Ben Okopnik, Karl-Heinz Herrmann, René Pfeiffer, Mulyadi Santosa, Neil Youngman, Steve Brown ]
...and you, our readers!

---

Gazette Matters

---

Official Twitter?

Amit Saha [amitsaha.in at gmail.com]

Tue, 23 Mar 2010 15:01:10 +0530

Hi TAG:

Is this the official LG twitter a/c: http://twitter.com/linuxgazette ?

-Amit

-- 
Journal: http://amitksaha.wordpress.com,
�-blog: http://twitter.com/amitsaha

[ Thread continues here (6 messages/4.67kB) ]

---

Oh, one more thing...

Ben Okopnik [ben at linuxgazette.net]

Mon, 1 Mar 2010 11:53:35 -0500

...has anyone noticed anything different about TAG? No? Good.

The Answer Gang list - in fact, all the LG lists - have now been rehosted, and everything seems to be working fine (LG itself is still hosted where it was, due to the kind offices of Thomas Fullhart of Fullhart Software, http://fullhartsoftware.com/). That's a very large load off my mind, and much thanks to René Pfeiffer whose help in this move made the list transition much, much easier.

There's something I'd like to mention at this point; something really important, and something that I'm going to cover in this month's Back Page in LG. It's a change in policy - one of those things that I do only on occasion, and not simply when it's warranted but when it's required. Experience has shown that it is, indeed, required.

The addition to our policy is a simple one: Be nice. Be polite. Bastard Operators from Hell are explicitly unwelcome. No rudeness is allowed in LG from here forward - and this is the way it'll stay as long as I'm EiC, and as long as I'm associated with LG in any way.

The recent flamewar here in TAG has convinced me that this needs to be a hard limit, for my own sake as well as that of everyone else. I've let my temper get away from me here in the past, and that's no more acceptable than it is for anyone else to do so.

René has agreed to serve as the TAG moderator, and I'm as much subject to his decisions as anyone else. As for the broader issue of LG itself, my interpretation of this policy is "no more ranting (humor excepted)" in the articles.

Whatever went on in the past, I want every aspect of LG to be that of a pleasant, professional environment - for our staff as well as our readers. Suggestions for making it more so are always welcome.

-- 
* Ben Okopnik * Editor-in-Chief, Linux Gazette * http://LinuxGazette.NET *

[ Thread continues here (3 messages/3.09kB) ]

---

Our Mailbag

---

Weird networking question

Deividson Okopnik [deivid.okop at gmail.com]

Fri, 19 Mar 2010 11:00:53 -0300

Hello TAG!

I have an unusual networking problem to solve here, and I'm needing some help.

Basically I got a machine with 2 network interfaces, eth0 and eth1, and both are connected in the same hub.

But eth0 has the ip 192.168.0.97, and doesnt need a proxy to access the internet. Eth1's ip is 192.168.0.200, and that IP needs a proxy to access the internet (and several sites are blocked, etc).

Alls configured, but it seems that everything's trying to use the eth1 to access the internet, and I need it to be accessed using eth0. Everything should use eth0, I just need eth1 to be used for apache and mysql...

Any clue on how to configure that?

Thanks

Deividson

[ Thread continues here (12 messages/12.93kB) ]

---

Backup Strategy

Amit Saha [amitsaha.in at gmail.com]

Sat, 6 Mar 2010 20:29:43 +0530

Hello all:

I have a simple requirement- I want to back up all my lab's data (~ 1TB and increasing) to a 2TB hard-disk on another machine. How best should I partition/create volumes on my 2 TB hard-disk so as to enable my backups? I have no special requirements. Just simple dumping of the contents from one to another. In the same vein, I would like to hear how you do something similar.

(I plan to use rsync for the same)

Best,

Amit

-- 
Journal: http://amitksaha.wordpress.com,
�-blog: http://twitter.com/amitsaha
 
Freenode: cornucopic in #scheme, #lisp, #math,#linux, #python

[ Thread continues here (11 messages/11.89kB) ]

---

Rabbit Vcs

Jimmy O'Regan [joregan at gmail.com]

Fri, 19 Mar 2010 19:08:43 +0000

http://www.rabbitvcs.org/

TortoiseSVN clone for gnome - great for anyone who is not a version control ninja, but would like to play one on TV

---

Talkback: Discuss this article with The Answer Gang

2-Cent Tips

Two-cent Tip: Yo! zdump!

Ben Okopnik [ben at linuxgazette.net]

Sun, 14 Mar 2010 23:43:47 -0400

----- Forwarded message from "s. keeling" <[email protected]> -----

I've yet again just discovered that tomorrow morning is "spring forward Day", so this may be apropos:

   alias dst="zdump -v Canada/Mountain | grep $(date '+%Y')"

Substitute your TZ for C/M, of course. Submit to 2cT?

-- 
* Ben Okopnik * Editor-in-Chief, Linux Gazette * http://LinuxGazette.NET *

[ Thread continues here (7 messages/6.86kB) ]

---

Two-cent Tip: VirtualBox Tricks?

clarjon1 [clarjon1 at gmail.com]

Thu, 25 Mar 2010 09:20:19 -0400

Hey Gang! I don't know how many of you use VirtualBox (OSE or otherwise), but I was wondering if any of you had any cool tricks-of-the trade that perhaps readers might be able to use. To start off with, here's one that makes VBox really easy for my mom to use, a little something I've called the "XP Start Button": It's essentially an icon on the desktop/menu entry. I've upgraded her laptop to find that she's never ever had a need to boot up windows, but unfortunately the tax guy wants her to run windows specific software. Anyways, here's the tip: Create a .desktop file in a folder/desktop, and fill it with the following:

[Desktop Entry]
Encoding=UTF-8
Version=1.0
Type=Application
Terminal=false
Name[en_US]=Windows XP
Exec=VirtualBox --startvm "Windows XP"
Name=Windows XP

Of course, replacing the name of the virtual machine with the one you wish to start on opening of the .desktop file.

Hope to hear more tips, wonder what tweaks i might learn

---

Talkback: Discuss this article with The Answer Gang

News Bytes

By Deividson Luiz Okopnik and Howard Dyckoff

Contents: News in General Conferences and Events Distro News Software and Product News

Selected and Edited by Deividson Okopnik

Please submit your News Bytes items in plain text; other formats may be rejected without reading. [You have been warned!] A one- or two-paragraph summary plus a URL has a much higher chance of being published than an entire press release. Submit items to [email protected]. Deividson can also be reached via twitter.

---

---

Talkback: Discuss this article with The Answer Gang

---

Deividson was born in União da Vitória, PR, Brazil, on 14/04/1984. He became interested in computing when he was still a kid, and started to code when he was 12 years old. He is a graduate in Information Systems and is finishing his specialization in Networks and Web Development. He codes in several languages, including C/C++/C#, PHP, Visual Basic, Object Pascal and others.

Deividson works in Porto União's Town Hall as a Computer Technician, and specializes in Web and Desktop system development, and Database/Network Maintenance.

---

Howard Dyckoff is a long term IT professional with primary experience at Fortune 100 and 200 firms. Before his IT career, he worked for Aviation Week and Space Technology magazine and before that used to edit SkyCom, a newsletter for astronomers and rocketeers. He hails from the Republic of Brooklyn [and Polytechnic Institute] and now, after several trips to Himalayan mountain tops, resides in the SF Bay Area with a large book collection and several pet rocks.

Howard maintains the Technology-Events blog at blogspot.com from which he contributes the Events listing for Linux Gazette. Visit the blog to preview some of the next month's NewsBytes Events.

Magic and Mayhem

By Anonymous

It all started with SAK, the Secure Attention Key, that was supposed to get me out of trouble in Ubuntu. The help I got was a kernel panic.

Investigations followed; doubts followed the investigations. I report starting with a recap on SysRq, mainly from

http://www.kernel.org/doc/documentation/sysrq.txt

This doc lacks important information, but it is included here.

(1) What is the 'magic' SysRq key?

It is a key combo the kernel will immediately respond to, whatever it is doing - assuming it was compiled with the CONFIG_MAGIC_SYSRQ option. This is the case with the major GNU/Linux distros.

(2) Need the SysRq key be enabled?

No, when running a kernel with SysRq compiled in, the key is (usually) enabled. However, distributions like openSUSE have a restricted value in /proc/sys/kernel/sysrq - meaning that, according to their documentation, sysrq is disabled by default. But you can disable or restrict it courtesy of /proc/sys/kernel/sysrq. By default, this file contains 1 and SysRq is fully enabled (with some exceptions - see above). To disable SysRq, write 0 to the file.

To restrict functionality selectively, pick values from this table:

Value	Option
2	Enable control of console logging level
4	Enable control of keyboard (e.g. SAK)
8	Enable debugging dumps of processes etc.
16	Enable sync command
32	Enable remount read-only
64	Enable signalling of processes (term, kill, oom-kill)
128	Allow reboot/poweroff
256	Allow rescheduling

Pick your options, sum their values, write the sum to /proc/sys/kernel/sysrq; after that, only your options will be allowed.

The value in /proc/sys/kernel/sysrq determines the shortcuts available to all users and is not subject to permissions. However, writing to this file requires root privileges. And since the file is not really a file and dies when shutting down or rebooting, the writing has to be repeated after each boot.

The option 'sysrq_always_enabled' in the kernel line of the boot loader will let the kernel ignore /proc/sys/kernel/sysrq.

(3) How do I use the SysRq key on x86 PCs?

Press the key combo Alt-SysRq-command_key, where 'SysRq' is same as 'PrintScreen' and command_key is a case-insensitive letter or a digit from

    b,c,d,e,f,g,h,i,j,k,l,m,n,o,p,q,r,s,t,u,v,w,x,z,0-9

Needless to say, it is awkward or even infeasible to hold down three keys at once when two of them are a stretched hand apart. Just do:

    hold down Alt (either on the right or on the left)
    press and release SysRq quickly
    press command_key quickly
    release everything

Quickly means: don't dither, or Ubuntu will pop up a Screen Shot dialog.

NOTE: the position of keys is as on the US keyboard! Keep this in mind when using a non-US keyboard. For instance, 'q' is the key just right of Tab even if that same key carries the label 'a' on a French keyboard.

Indeed, you are not sending an 'a' or a 'q': you are sending a well-defined scancode to the kernel. Keyboards needn't apply if they produce scancodes different from those of the common PC keyboards.

Only details for a couple of the commands are of interest in the current context:

i	Kill all processes, except init.
k	Secure Attention Key (SAK) kills all applications on the current virtual console.
0-9	Sets the console log level, controlling which kernel messages will show on your console: 0 would let only emergency messages reach the console while 9 is verbose.

(4) Kernel Panic

So why do I very reliably trigger a kernel panic when I press SAK on Ubuntu 9.10, both in the text console and on the desktop? The difference between the two is that the kernel panic is immediate in the text console. On the desktop it may look like everything is ok, then you press e.g. Alt-Ctrl-F1 to switch to a text console and it happens.

Well, this is a bug already reported in February 2009 for a previous version:

https://bugs.launchpad.net/Ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/329576/

An addendum to the bug report says the bug manifests on AMD boards, but not necessarily on Intel boards. I can confirm that I do get my kernel panic on AMD hardware, but I have also seen it on an Intel motherboard with a VIA graphic adapter.

A related bug was reported for Debian in August 2009:

http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=543324/

but here the console-kit-daemon was pointed out as the culprit. I disabled it, the bug is still active on my Ubuntu.

Changing the log level with Alt-SysRq-9 allows for a flood of low level details for the initiated. What is clear, reading and watching, is that an attempt to kill the 'init' process occurs - certainly not the kernel's intention. Who is trying to kill init? Something specific to Ubuntu, shall we say, since openSUSE doesn't do it.

Now, when I try Alt-SysRq-i to kill all processes except init, I get a kernel panic exactly as with SAK, exactly with the same message about init's attempted murder.

That Ubuntu bug of February 2009 got no follow-up, not even an assignment to a developer, not even a priority rank. What does it take for serious bugs to get fixed in Ubuntu?

(5) Security by Good Luck

At the end of the day, what we know is disturbing:

• Everybody wants the magic of SysRq, otherwise the major distros would not compile it in.
• The administrator can reduce SysRq's functionality, but not just for the unwashed masses. Any reduction in SysRq's functionality will equally affect the administrator. Functionality cannot be changed on the fly, because when a critical situation arises you already need it.
• Even disregarding bugs like Ubuntu SAK's bug, SysRq has options to bring down and damage the entire system. If you start disabling them, SysRq loses its magic in the difficult situations it is called for. So if you as an administrator want SysRq, you are offering vandals and experimenters a comfortable way to wreak havoc.

Is a GNU/Linux system the most insecure system in the history of computers? Why is the SysRq magic not reserved for root?[1]

---

[1] That's an easy question to answer - although, unfortunately, the answer does nothing to address this concern. Since most Linux users are (hopefully) not logged in as root most of the time, restricting SysRq to root-only would make it essentially useless at precisely the times when it's needed. Perhaps a reasonable approach to a SysRq policy is to disable the "dangerous" features by default, and enable them on specific machines that need more specific troubleshooting? -- Ben

Talkback: Discuss this article with The Answer Gang

---

A. N. Onymous has been writing for LG since the early days - generally by sneaking in at night and leaving a variety of articles on the Editor's desk. A man (woman?) of mystery, claiming no credit and hiding in darkness... probably something to do with large amounts of treasure in an ancient Mayan temple, and a beautiful dark-eyed woman with a snake tattoo winding down from her left hip. Or maybe A.N. is just into privacy. In any case, we're grateful for the contributions.
-- Editor, Linux Gazette

Linux's problem with Simplified Chinese

By Silas Brown

Chinese characters are used not only in Mainland China but also in Taiwan, Hong Kong, Japan, and sometimes in Korea and other places. There are differences in the way these countries write certain characters, and ideally this should just be a matter of selecting a different font. However, for various reasons some (but not all) of the "Simplified Chinese" characters used on the mainland have been given their own Unicode numbers that are different from the Unicode numbers of their nearest equivalent characters in Japan, etc. This leads to a problem.

Imagine a typical text in Simplified Chinese. Some of the characters have their own special code numbers that occur only in Simplified texts, whereas other characters have code numbers that can also occur in Japanese and other texts. Now imagine that a rendering system such as Pango is going to render this text. Pango takes the text character by character, and tries to find each character in the available fonts. Suppose it first of all finds a character that occurs in a Japanese font. There is a Japanese font on the system, so it takes that character from the Japanese font and renders it. But then the next character is not in the Japanese font because it is a special Simplified character that occurs only in a Simplified Chinese font. There is a Simplified Chinese font on the system too, so off it goes and renders that second character from the Simplified Chinese font.

The problem is that some of the characters (the ones that have special Simplified-only codepoints) will be rendered from the Simplified Chinese font, but others (the ones that share codepoints with Japanese etc) will be rendered from another font. If the fonts happen to have the exact same style and weight, etc., then nobody will notice, but usually there are noticeable differences in style between the fonts, so this mixing of fonts, with some characters taken from one font and others taken from another, can make the display of Simplified Chinese on Linux look very unprofessional.

Many users can tolerate this situation on the screen, but printing is a different matter. For example, the music typesetting system GNU Lilypond uses Pango to render the text of lyrics, etc., and if you want to produce beautiful-looking copy with Simplified Chinese text, this character-by-character mixing of fonts could be a showstopper.

The Pango renderer does have facilities for application programmers to specify the language and therefore influence the choice of fonts, such as by calling pango_context_set_language() or by using Pango markup. However, this is small consolation for those using applications that do not expose this functionality to the user.

One thing you can do is edit your ~/.fonts.conf file to tell the system which fonts you prefer. This will affect all applications, so you may need to change it back when you want to see Traditional Chinese or Japanese, etc. Below is a ~/.fonts.conf file which specifies the Arphic Simplified Chinese font as a preference (Debian/Ubuntu package ttf-arphic-gbsn00lp). It also specifies DejaVu for the Latin fonts, along with Gandhari, a font which is good for Pinyin markup.

<fontconfig>
	<alias>
		<family>serif</family>
		<prefer>
            <family>gandhari unicode</family>
			<family>dejavu serif</family>
			<family>ar pl sungtil gb</family>
		</prefer>
	</alias>
	<alias>
		<family>sans-serif</family>
		<prefer>
            <family>gandhari unicode</family>
			<family>dejavu sans</family>
			<family>ar pl sungtil gb</family>
		</prefer>
	</alias>
	<alias>
		<family>monospace</family>
		<prefer>
			<family>dejavu sans mono</family>
			<family>ar pl sungtil gb</family>
		</prefer>
	</alias>
</fontconfig>

On a Debian or Ubuntu system, most of the families can be seen by looking at /var/lib/defoma/x-ttcidfont-conf.d/dirs/TrueType/fonts.dir. To install Gandhari, download it from Andrew Glass's site, visit fonts:/ in Konqueror (package konqueror if you don't already have KDE) and drag gur.ttf into that folder.

This approach does not solve everything; for example, the on-screen display of Chinese in Tk applications might still be inconsistent (it does not seem possible to set a preferred order of fonts in Tk/X11; you can set one preferred font but there's no obvious way to control what it falls back on when displaying characters that are not available in that font). However, the use of ~/.fonts.conf should at least help with applications that you are likely to use for printing.

Talkback: Discuss this article with The Answer Gang

---

Silas Brown is a legally blind computer scientist based in Cambridge UK. He has been using heavily-customised versions of Debian Linux since 1999.

Away Mission - Recommended for April

By Howard Dyckoff

Spring has sprung and the venerable MySQL User Conference is coming up. That conference is still independent of the Oracle OpenWorld behemoth, partly due to the promises Oracle made to the EU about keeping MySQL alive and independent. But don't blink: the separate focus on the respected Open Source database may not last. So do drop in to see the event and its expo if you have a chance. Expo passes may still be free in early April.

MySQL Conference & Expo 2010
April 12-15, Convention Center, Santa Clara, CA
http://en.oreilly.com/mysql2010/

I would also recommend the Linux Foundation's 4th Annual Collaboration Summit - if you can wangle an invite. It is a gathering place for kernel developers and Open Source rock stars, but the sessions are detailed and real collaboration occurs.

The Summit does overlap the MySQL event by 2 days, but it should be possible to catch the opening MySQL keynotes and then attend the Summit for the rest of the week. I would have to rate the food and snacks a bit better at the O'Reilly-run MySQL Conference, and in both cases the company is stellar. At the Summit this would include core kernel developers, distribution maintainers, ISVs, end users, system vendors, and other community organizations. It's geared to collaboration and solutions by bringing together a cross-section of leaders to tackle and solve the most pressing issues facing Linux today.

Attendees of the CELF Embedded Linux Conference and the LSF '09 Workshop will be automatically approved. Or, just enroll in the LF324 Linux Performance Tuning Linux Training Course and get a free invitation to the Linux Foundation Collaboration Summit.

Here's the location for the slides from last year's Collaboration Summit:
http://events.linuxfoundation.org/archive/2009/collaboration-summit/slides

Linux Foundation Collaboration Summit
co-located with the Linux Forum Embedded Linux Conference
April 14-16, 2010, Hotel Kabuki, San Francisco, CA

Finally, I also have to recommend the excellent Emerging Communications Conference, which returns the the San Francisco Airport Marriott again. It has been a cross between a Maker event, an Open Source network event, and something entirely its own.

Slides from the previous event are here: http://www.slideshare.net/ecommconf

eComm - The Emerging Communications Conference
April 19-21, 2010, Airport Marriott, San Francisco, CA
http://america.ecomm.ec/2010/

Talkback: Discuss this article with The Answer Gang

---

Howard Dyckoff is a long term IT professional with primary experience at Fortune 100 and 200 firms. Before his IT career, he worked for Aviation Week and Space Technology magazine and before that used to edit SkyCom, a newsletter for astronomers and rocketeers. He hails from the Republic of Brooklyn [and Polytechnic Institute] and now, after several trips to Himalayan mountain tops, resides in the SF Bay Area with a large book collection and several pet rocks.

Howard maintains the Technology-Events blog at blogspot.com from which he contributes the Events listing for Linux Gazette. Visit the blog to preview some of the next month's NewsBytes Events.

Pixie Chronicles: Part 1 Lessons from Mistakes

By Henry Grebler

Adam

I had a friend, Adam, who passed away far too young. Adam seemed to be competent at an amazing number of activities, mostly self-taught. He built himself a house almost single-handedly.

He once shared with me the secret of building. Adam would say that it was not possible to build a house without making mistakes. The secret, he said, was hiding your mistakes. For example, builders can never get the floor and walls to fit together exactly. So they invented skirting boards; for walls and ceiling: mouldings and cornices.

Subsequently, somebody must have decided to extend the concept and they became decorative. Now that's really hiding your mistakes - pretend that they are a feature!

Perhaps because I know (or think I know) more than the average bear about Linux, I get "adventurous", particularly on my projects at home. When I extend my activities beyond my areas of competence I frequently make mistakes. That's not intrinsically a bad thing: you have to break eggs to make an omelette. But it's important to be able to recover from mistakes.

As a result, I've adapted Adam's advice to fields which interest me.

Project

My project for last week was to build a server. Sounds simple. What could possibly go wrong? Watch and learn.

I run (the fairly old) Fedora Core 5 on my desktop, so I thought I'd install the latest Fedora on my server. I say "server" but it's actually a Pentium II, one of a pair a friend was throwing out. The other one replaced my aging (12-year-old Pentium 1 100) firewall.

But my project is more about concept than commercial-strength mail and web-serving, so grunt[1] is not important to me.

Installing from CDs holds no fascination for me: I've done it so many times, the novelty has worn off. I decided I'd do a "Look, Ma! No hands!" install.

The Pentium II was a Compaq which must have been quite leading edge when it was purchased. Of particular interest was the fact that it had on-board hardware PXE capability. I conceived a plan which would see the machine perform a network boot, then perform a network install driven by a kickstart file. Everything would be automatic: partitioning, timezone, system language, configuration of 2 NICs, root password - the lot.

As an exercise in building a single server, this approach is not very efficient. However, as an exercise in building multiple servers, it is excellent. One of the dangers of having a human (me) perform the same task repeatedly is that boredom sets in and the human (me) loses concentration, leading to mistakes. It is worth investing effort into automating the process. Although I currently have neither the hardware nor the need to build a farm of servers, I would like to learn the technique for the future. So for me, this is a learning exercise.

The following sections are written from the perspective of the machine to be built, which I'll call the target machine.

Typical Install

To provide some context, here is an overview of a typical install. Bear in mind that my old Compaq only has a CD drive (not DVD).

1. Turn on the target machine.
2. Insert the first install CD.
   • Machine boots from the removable disk, loading the install environment.
3. Proceed through many screens answering questions about partitioning, timezone, system language, etc.
   • The machine begins to install from the first CD.
   • After a while, the machine asks for the second CD.
4. Change CDs.
5. Repeat until all 6 install CDs have been processed.

Note that the numbered steps involve human intervention. The indented sentences describe the target machine's behaviour.

Intended Install

Here is my rough plan for how things were supposed to go.

1. Turn on the target machine.
   • Machine starts the boot process, asks the network for an IP address, then downloads the install environment.
   • The install environment uses the kickstart file to guide the rest of the install. It obtains the install files from the network. No further intervention is required.

Actual First Attempt

And here's what happened the first time.

1. I turned on the target machine.
   • The machine booted, asked the network for an IP address, then downloaded the install environment.
   • The install environment used the kickstart file to guide the rest of the install.

However, it was here that I discovered the first of several mistakes.

I had not defined the partitioning information completely, so the machine stopped to ask for clarification.

I guess I could have gone back and fixed the problem and restarted, but it occurred to me that I might have made other mistakes. I decided to answer the partitioning questions and proceed.

Remarkably, that was the only problem. Or so it seemed. The install proceeded. It seemed to take a very long time, but I was not too surprised by this: the target machine is, after all, a Pentium II.

It is at this stage that a kickstart install starts to pay back. The install may take a long time, but I don't have to stay around to change CDs. There are always other tasks to be done, and in this case I left the room for several hours.

On my return, the machine was again asking for clarification about partitioning!

What had happened?!

Things Go Wrong

There is a temptation when things go wrong to start doing. This is almost invariably bad. It often leads to regretting! It takes some discipline and experience to stop and think.

"Doing" quite often leads to activities which modify the "crime scene". One then gets to a point where one wants to know what something looked like before the "doing" began. Too late.

"Thinking" doesn't prevent all mistakes, only some.

What had gone wrong?

How does one even begin to think in such a case? Well, every activity typically has a beginning, a middle, and an end.

The install had started ok. I'd then had the partitioning problem. After that, the install seemed to proceed as expected. So beginning and middle seemed to be off the hook. I concluded that I should look at the end.

What should have happened after the install completed?

I remembered that one of the kickstart parameters related to this. I had requested that the machine reboot after install.

In an install from CD, once the install environment has processed the last CD, it asks the user to remove any install media from the drive. By default, when the machine subsequently reboots, it takes its data from the recently installed hard drive.

However, in my case, on reboot, the machine performed its PXE boot - which restarted the install process. Thank heavens for my partitioning mistake. Without it, the install would have proceeded as before, come to the end - and started all over again. It might still be at it now, repeatedly booting and installing!

I guess after a few days I might have grown suspicious.

It's an ill wind that blows no good; and sometimes, as in this case, a mistake can be your friend.

Analysis

My first mistake was unexceptional. To install FC10 I needed to get a number of steps right. As we shall soon see, I've glossed over some of the steps to tell this part of the story simply. It is unsurprising that I did not get everything right the first time. (I would have been very surprised had everything just worked!)

The second mistake was much more interesting. It relates to the case where an action is repeated but the conditions change between the first and a later occurrence of that action. It's the sort of problem that is common in loops.

In this case, the first time I booted the machine, I wanted it to use PXE; the second time, I didn't. I hadn't realised that I had wanted different behaviours.

Even stated like this, it was not clear to me what to do next. At first sight, the simple solution is to request that the install environment not reboot at the end of the install. But, as we shall see in the next part, that solution is somewhat short-sighted.

Lessons

When something goes wrong, don't rush to act. Stop, think, and plan before acting.

---

[1] Reading Henry's articles is giving me a great workout in Aussie colloquialisms - "grunt" in this case, I'm told, means "muscle", i.e. computing power. -- Kat

Talkback: Discuss this article with The Answer Gang

---

Henry was born in Germany in 1946, migrating to Australia in 1950. In his childhood, he taught himself to take apart the family radio and put it back together again - with very few parts left over.

After ignominiously flunking out of Medicine (best result: a sup in Biochemistry - which he flunked), he switched to Computation, the name given to the nascent field which would become Computer Science. His early computer experience includes relics such as punch cards, paper tape and mag tape.

He has spent his days working with computers, mostly for computer manufacturers or software developers. It is his darkest secret that he has been paid to do the sorts of things he would have paid money to be allowed to do. Just don't tell any of his employers.

He has used Linux as his personal home desktop since the family got its first PC in 1996. Back then, when the family shared the one PC, it was a dual-boot Windows/Slackware setup. Now that each member has his/her own computer, Henry somehow survives in a purely Linux world.

He lives in a suburb of Melbourne, Australia.

Yes, Master

By Henry Grebler

Dogs are the leaders of the planet. If you see two life 
forms, one of them's making a poop, the other one's 
carrying it for him, who would you assume is in charge?
					- Jerry Seinfeld

I'm not in the habit of bagging Microsoft. No, really. Oh, all right, I am.

Have a look at this picture. I swear that it's for real. It popped up on more than one occasion on my company laptop. I don't know whether it came from XP, some other piece of Microsoft software, or some other software altogether. But it just beggars belief!

I just looked on my Linux desktop: uptime - 126 days. I don't even think that's a particularly impressive number.

All right, my desktop is not a laptop. So?!

And what is it with turning it off for at least 15 minutes? Nap time?! Imagine if they used this technology in, oh, fridges! Ships! Rockets to the moon! Military equipment! I'm sorry. Your war is important to us. To maintain your military lethality and extend its life, please shut down your war for at least 15 minutes.

Monday

OK, I've arrived at the office. 7:45 am. Nice and early. Good. I'm a morning person. It's great to come in before most of the others get in. Gives me time to do some work that requires concentration before the distraction level ramps up.

Wonder why they put us into these open-plan areas. Do they really think they are saving money? Or is it to do with pecking order? They're paying me a shirt-load of money, and yet I can hear the guy way over there on the phone to one of his customers. Try to concentrate. Crumbs, he's loud! They used to call me loud, but now I'm in the presence of a real master.

Get out the laptop. Turn it on. Get some real work done. Come on, boot up already! First password. Second password. Come on, XP! Finally: login password. What's it doing?

What's this? Virus scanner. Updating signatures. No response for me. Come on!

Why did I turn on this #@$#&^ing computer? Who's the human? WTF is going on here?

What now? Some of my software is out of date. I don't even use that software. Why would I care if it is out of date? I just wanna do some work, for crissake! Who's in charge here?

Start up Adobe. Wait for it to update something. This is crazy!

There seems to be this view that I'm the laptop's lackey. I'm here to service its requirements. It gives the orders; I follow. Its needs are more important; mine are secondary.

Are we for real? The lunatics are in charge of the asylum!

A better way

Are we saying that we have reached the pinnacle of technical engineering? That this is the best we can do?

Well, we know that there are various forms of improvement. On my Linux systems, I run no regular antivirus software. Or antispyware. Or any other sort of anti-malware software. (The only reason I have any antivirus software at all is so that I can scan my teenage son's Microsoft computer.)

The argument is that if Linux were as ubiquitous as Microsoft, then the malware generators would attack Linux. As it is, they're just after the low-hanging fruit.

All right. Let's accept that. For the sake of argument, let's assume that it is necessary to update things on a Microsoft PC. Fine. Can't we do that in a less obnoxious way?

Let's start with some low-hanging fruit of our own.

Sometimes, I reboot my computer repeatedly in a short space of time. (Never mind why; it can happen.) Is it really asking too much of the cretinous antivirus software to keep track of when it was last invoked (or when I last rebooted), and to not even run if less than X hours have elapsed?! And, OK, if some user actually wants every one of the three reboots in the last hour to be followed by a scan, let him/her configure the software to do that. Hell, I don't even mind if it's the default. Just give me the option to do what I want.

That's what's really missing from a lot of software which runs on Microsoft platforms: user choice. The technology which should be the most liberating has been engineered to be antidemocratic. And down-right irritating.

OK. There are times during the day when I get up from my seat and walk away from my desk. Corporation rules say that I'm supposed to screenlock the laptop when I leave. Even if I don't, after a few minutes, the laptop does it anyway. Hey, you now know that I'm not at the computer. You know I'm not pressing keys. Wouldn't you think that now would be a good time to use up CPU cycles? I don't need them. I've gone off to make myself a coffee and discuss the weekend's footy with Alex.

I come back to the computer, enter my password. Don't abort what you were doing; pause it. You are a machine of infinite patience. (Or software of infinite patience.) Make a little note somewhere of where you were up to - and take a break. When I wander off next time, continue from where you left off.

Eventually, I head off for lunch. Hey, knock yourself out. Scan all the hard drives. As far as I care, make the whole machine walk across the desk from the vibrations. Do whatever you need to do. Just make sure you pause when I come back.

I'm at work for about 8 hours. Despite the little pop-up I showed before, I often turn on the laptop on Monday morning and don't turn it off again until Friday evening. In 24 hours, I only use 8-10 hours. You can have a minimum of 14 hours to do whatever you want. Just not on my watch.

What am I missing?

Is this so hard?

Is it beyond the capabilities of the mind of Homo Sapiens?

Perhaps it would not be possible 100% of the time. Sometimes, perhaps, something might need to be updated urgently. Personally, I think this most unlikely - but I entertain the possibility. But even if we can only arrange things so that I am undisturbed 90% of the time, that's still a huge improvement over what I see currently.

You can not be serious!

[Pace, John McEnroe.]

What is it with Microsoft and reboots?! Look at this:

OK, it's a joke, a reductio ad absurdum of the state of play at Microsoft. Compare that to BeOS which was designed to never need rebooting. Perhaps it's asking a bit too much of Microsoft to never need rebooting.

But why does it need to reboot if I change my IP address? Or a host of other fairly innocuous changes I make to the system?

All day long, I am bombarded with stupid questions: Are you sure? Did you really mean that? Is it OK to reboot now? Do you want fries with that? No, wait, that last one was from some other company.

Now here's an idea: how about, when I ask to shutdown or reboot, I get a prompt? Wouldn't that be a perfect time to say something like this?

X

        Hey! All day long I've been nagging you to upgrade your software, all the
        while discouraging you with threats that such upgrades will almost
        certainly necessitate a reboot (which I call a "restart" because God forbid
        we should spook the bunnies who use our, um, software with technical
        terms).  Well, I notice that you're about to shutdown or restart. Is now a
        good time to do those upgrades? I mean, do you have the time? (If you're
        heading home, you could take a pit-stop.)
        
        If now is not convenient, that's OK. I'll remind you next time.

OK Cancel

First of all, isn't that a good idea? And second, just maybe, isn't that a more appropriate tone for a pile of silicon to adopt when addressing a superior life-form?

Perhaps I shouldn't be surprised. I've always thought that Microsoft treats its users with contempt. Surely the tone it adopts in its dialogues and messages supports that view. The smug little utterances like "Windows must shutdown your computer now". The higher power has spoken!

Of course, once it has completed the upgrade, when it's time for the, ahem, restart, it will take cognizance of my original selection. In particular, if I chose to shutdown, it will, at this time, shutdown.

When next I fire up my machine, it will proceed with any subsequent actions needed to complete the install. The idea is to maximise utility and convenience for me. Because I'm the human.

It's not about you; it's about me.

Scanning for Pleasure

Turn on wife's machine. Windows 98. What's this? Disk scan? Scan disk? What is it doing? Just another way to slow me down.

In fairness, I should say that I haven't seen this on XP. But on my wife's Windows 98, it is very frequent.

I speculate that one day, quite some time ago, Bill was walking past a machine when it was booting into Linux. It was just at the point where it was doing an fsck.

It doesn't actually do anything - unless you call moving the progress bar doing something. It's just there to punish recalcitrance.

And the ultimate irony? Soon afterwards, Linux adopted a journaled file system, eliminating the need to check the file system even after an unclean shutdown.

You're probably thinking to yourself that my wife and I get what we deserve. I'd agree with you about me; but my wife is what is so coyly referred to as collateral damage.

Do you want to know why we have to run SCANDISK all the time? Because Windows lies to us.

My wife finishes her work. She shuts down as prescribed - by clicking on Start (!) and then following the bouncing ball. Eventually a splash screen appears.

	Windows is shutting down	

She waits. She does other things. It's time for bed, so she performs her nightly ablutions. She likes to read before going to sleep. You're not really interested in my wife's nightly routine.

Hours later, the stupid machine still hasn't turned off. She calls me to investigate. I look at her screen.

	Windows is shutting down	

Bill's message looks back at me mockingly. How much can a koala bear? Enraged, I turn off the power at the wall.

Next time her machine is powered up, Bill gets his revenge. D'oh!

Talkback: Discuss this article with The Answer Gang

---

Henry was born in Germany in 1946, migrating to Australia in 1950. In his childhood, he taught himself to take apart the family radio and put it back together again - with very few parts left over.

After ignominiously flunking out of Medicine (best result: a sup in Biochemistry - which he flunked), he switched to Computation, the name given to the nascent field which would become Computer Science. His early computer experience includes relics such as punch cards, paper tape and mag tape.

He has spent his days working with computers, mostly for computer manufacturers or software developers. It is his darkest secret that he has been paid to do the sorts of things he would have paid money to be allowed to do. Just don't tell any of his employers.

He has used Linux as his personal home desktop since the family got its first PC in 1996. Back then, when the family shared the one PC, it was a dual-boot Windows/Slackware setup. Now that each member has his/her own computer, Henry somehow survives in a purely Linux world.

He lives in a suburb of Melbourne, Australia.

Codeweavers vs. Cedega, Commercial Wine Product Comparison

By Jeff Hoogland

Most people who use Linux for desktop use are well aware of the one of the largest issues facing the platform: Lack of commercial software. Now in most cases this is not an issue, no MS Office - use OpenOffice, no Internet Explorer - use FireFox. However one thing which there is currently no replacement for is gaming. Try as they might there are just not enough Open-Source game developers (or even closed-sourced ones) that bring the level of gaming quality, as of yet, to Linux that Windows enjoys.

Enter the world of Win-on-Lin. The Wine Project, was started in 1993 and has slowly come into maturity over the course of the last sixteen years. Wine is a compatibility layer, or more precisely a reimplementation of the Windows API, that allows Windows applications to run under Linux. While the Wine project does a wonderful job of what it is designed to do (run Windows applications on Linux) how ever it sorely lacks in the means of a GUI front end for easy configuration/calibration.

Which brings me to my topic at hand - Cedega & Codeweavers. What are Cedega and Codeweavers? They two (closed source) programs both based off of the Wine Project to create what it lacks - a user friendly interface. Designed to help you get your Windows games working with ease on Linux. They both have their ups and downs and today I am going to look at each program and see how they compare. I currently have both Cedega and Codeweavers licenses so all the information given is from first hand experience working with both products. I'm going to be judging based on following criteria:

1. Functionality - How well do they do what they are suppose to do?
2. GUI Front End - How do the front-ends between the two compare?
3. Website - Being able to find information is everything, how do the websites compare?
4. Customer Service/Support - If you are paying for a product you want to know you can get help with it if it doesn't work properly.
5. Fees & Licensing - How much do they cost and what are you paying for?

Functionality

Cedega does a fairly good job of helping the user get their programs up and running. Upon selecting install it auto-detects any disc drives on the system for known game discs it can install. If it does not find any (or finds the wrong one) it is easy enough to direct it to the proper file/disc via the GUI. One of the things I really like about Cedega is the large number of pre-defined profiles it contains for different game titles (and just because you game isn't listed doesn't mean it will not work). Basically what this means is when you install a game that has a profile it automatically uses what are known to be the "best Wine settings" to get the optimum performance out of your game.

While Cedega does a great job at actually running the important parts of your games it is obvious that certain aspects of some programs have been neglected, Steam for instance works fine for loading and playing games but the friends network does not work in the slightest and installing flash for it is difficult at best.

Also worth noting here is that while Cedega started off as a fork of the Wine project (version 4.0 and earlier of Cedega was known as WineX or Wine Extreme) initially, it is no longer associated with it. Because of this of this fact the Windows API behind Cedega is also now different from that which powers Wine and as such there are a few applications that will not function under Wine (or things powered by Wine) that perform with out a hick-up under Cedega.

All in all I'm giving Cedega a 9 out of 10 points for functionality - it is a good software.

Functionality 9/10 - Cedega Total 9/10

Upon opening the Codeweavers program installer you are presented with a small list of applications that it will auto install and configure for you. I say small list because by comparison to the amount of game profiles listed under Cedega it feels somewhat incomplete. How ever as with Cedega just because the game you want to run is not on the list does not mean that it will not work. Also like Cedega, Codeweavers will auto detect any disc drives you have when you go to install a piece of software, one thing I also really like is that when detecting disc drives it also detects mounted iso files you may want to install from.

While the given list of games that are pre-configured in Codeweavers is small compared to the games list present in Cedega, it is very obvious that most of the games on the list have been worked on extensively to get them working to a optimum level with a careful attention to detail. Using Steam as my example again upon installation Codeweavers downloads and configures flash, in addition to other things, to help it work almost as good as it does natively on Windows (the only issue currently with the Steam UI is a small scroll bar issue).

Codeweavers is based directly off the Wine project, as such if a program works poorly under Wine odds are it is going to work just as poorly under Codeweavers. As such this also means that any performance you see with an application under Codeweavers can be replicated under just a standard Wine install (how ever it may take you several hours to get everything just right).

I'm giving Codeweavers an 8 out of 10 on functionality. It is good software but it needs to expand its games list some.

Functionality 8/10 - Codeweavers Total 8/10

GUI Front End

One of the most important things about both these pieces of software is their GUI. One of the wonderful things about Linux is how alot of things "just work" and having a front end to install Windows applications through is a nice addition to have.

The Cedega GUI does a nice job of giving you a centralized location to house all of your Games/Windows applications. (You can add launchers for your favorite native Linux apps/games to it as well) Also present in Cedega that Codeweavers does not have is a "diagnostic test". Basically it checks over your hardware and configuration for anything that may cause issues when running your games. In addition to being able to check your configuration the diagnostic tool also allows for an easy copy and paste of your system specifications which is useful if you are unsure of your setup (or too lazy to type it out) when trying to debug an issue.

Lacking in the Cedega GUI how ever are native menu entries. Applications installed under Cedega often times feel foreign as you have to open a separate program to launch them or create your own custom menu entry (and hunting down the correct icon for you game can be a headache). Also worth noting with netbooks becoming more and more popular is that the Cedega GUI is obviously designed for a resolution of at least 768 pixel height, parts of it get cut off on most netbook screens. The Cedega GUI as a whole is good but it could stand a few changes - 8 out of 10

GUI Front End 8/10 - Cedega Total 8.5/10

While Codeweavers does not give you a centralized location for all your install applications like Cedega does, however it is still well done. Codeweavers does a beautiful job of integrating with your local menus (Gnome, KDE, ect) when installing applications. In fact if Codeweavers would simply add the games you install to the games section of your menu instead of its own section I do not think most users would be able to tell the difference between a natively installed game and one installed via Codeweavers. Same as Cedega here 8 of 10, fully functional but could still be slightly better.

GUI Front End 8/10 - Codeweavers Total 8/10

Website

Knowledge is power as they say, one of the most important things about any piece of software you may have is that you fully understand how to use it. Often times these days ones of the best resources for learning such information is an application's homepage.

Cedega's home page is relatively horrid to say the least. It does provide the basic information on the product and pricing but that is about it. Many parts of the website have been 100% non-functional for the last months I have had my subscription and it really takes from the product as a whole. Voting for which applications you wish to be supported is one key feature that is lacking for example. On top of this another "feature" of the page is that you cannot view certain data if you do not have a current subscription - meaning if you are someone looking into Cedega to see if it will run a certain game you will have to pony up the cash to give it a try. Also horrid is the Cedega rating system for applications which has three options: "Certified, Works, and Known not to Work". Certified means you are able to contact customer service in order to get help with said application should an issue arise and well the other two kind of explain them self. Also, and this is not Cedega's fault per-say but odds are is due to a small user base, but the information about many application in their listing is rather lacking by comparison to others.

Cedega's website needs some HUGE improvements, as of now it is functional. So I'll give it a 4 out of 10.

Website 4/10 - Cedega Total 6.7/10

Codeweaver's website is a refreshing change from that of Cedega. It is obviously that of a professional company, the layout is nice and everything is clearly labeled. Everything is accessible with or with out a user login. If you are a member they have a nice system for allowing you to "vote" for which applications you would like to see better support for (So they know what they should be spending time working on). The user forums are slightly non-standard but not necessarily in a bad way, they just take some getting used to. Also a feature worth noting is Codeweavers ticketing system, you can browse past support tickets that yourself or other people have posted for solutions to past issues.

I really do not have anything bad to say about the Codeweavers website, it is well done and fully functional - 10 out of 10

Website 10/10 - Codeweavers Total 8.5/10

Customer Service/Support

So one of the most important things to know when you are buying something is that you are going to be able to get support for the product if it does not work as it is suppose to.

Cedega's customer support is decent. They give you a good response and help you solve any issues you may be having to a satisfactory amount. How ever also worth noting is that the only way to get customer support is via Email. And they only provide official support for their list of forty or so "certified" games and if you are running certain hardware configuration (they only support nVidia gfx cards and certain distros). And I feel I should also mention that their customer service is rather slow to return emails.

They also how ever have community powered message boards (which they link from their website) where there are a few very dedicated people who work hard to help people solve their problems, I found these boards to be a much faster response than the official email support.

Cedega customer support isn't bad per-say but it also is not anything exceptional - 7 out of 10

Customer Service/Support 7/10 - Cedega Total 7/10

Codeweaver's provides two different channels of customer support, one through their wonderful ticket/email system and on their official message boards. The response time for a ticket I have filed has never been less than a day, often times if I filed the ticket during normal business hours I would see a response within a few hours. Their forums also have a few helpful individuals as well as good number of staff that watch over and do their best to help out with any issues that may arise while using the software.

No customer support is perfect but Codeweaver's is darn good to say the least 9 out of 10

Customer Service/Support 9/10 - Codeweavers Total 8.75/10

Fees and Licensing

I've spent time talking about the ups and downs of these two pieces of software now - how do you get it? And more importantly how much does it cost?

Cedega starts at $15 for a three month subscription with varying prices if you buy for an extended length of time ($45 for a year for instance). Cedega is yours to install so long as you keep paying for it (after the subscription runs out you will no longer be able to download Cedega anymore - meaning if you format you are SOL). Also worth mentioning here is that the only "demo" Cedega provides is for a single game - Spore. And as I said above you cannot see the full games data base unless you also pay for it. So unless you know someone else with a subscription you may very well pay for it to try a game only to find out doesn't work well. Too be fair though it's only $15 for the three months, not truly expensive. I personally do not care for how Cedega licensing works - 6 out of 10.

Fees and Licensing 6/10 - Cedega Total 6.8/10

Codeweaver's CXGames costs $40 for the product and a year's worth of support and updates. After that it is $35 for a following year of support/updates and even if you do not renew you still get to continue using the Codeweavers software you had paid for initially. Now $40 is a fair bit of cash if you are unsure if something is going to work for you - however Codeweavers offers a 7 day demo of the full software so you can use it and see if it works for your needs. Also worth noting is that while Codeweavers is closed source software they are powered directly by the Wine project - and as such they give back to it (with code and money). I don't mind paying a reasonable cost for good software and the fact that they give some of it back to the Wine project also makes me feel good - 9/10

Fees and Licensing 9/10 - Codeweavers Total 8.8/10

Final Scores - Cedega 6.8 & Codeweavers 8.8

Follow Up

Obviously no piece of software is perfect - these two included - and while Wine technology has come a long way in the last decade (or so) it still has a long way to go. As you can see from the numbers and the above information I prefer Codeweavers to Cedega, come the end of the year I do not think I will be renewing my Cedega license Which of the two is right for you is your choice, I just hope my little comparison here may have presented you with some information on each of them you had not known before.

Talkback: Discuss this article with The Answer Gang

---

I am currently a full time student working my way through a math education program on the south side of Chicago. I work in both theatre & computer fields currently. I am a huge believer in Linux and believe we will see Microsoft's dominant market share on the personal computer crumble at some point in the next twenty years. I write a good deal about technology and you can always find my most current thoughts/reviews/ramblings at http://jeffhoogland.blogspot.com/

Quick and Dirty Web Filtering on Linux

By Anderson Silva

Have you ever mistyped a web address and ended up somewhere you definitely did not want to go? You miss one letter in the URL, and instead of getting to your favorite site, you end up in the virtual red light district! So what if instead of you making this mistake, it's your child accidentally going to these questionable sites? I have two kids, an eight and a ten year old, and both of them have been actively playing Flash-based kids' games online since they were two years old. So lately I've been thinking of solutions to this problem.

There are plenty of non-open-source solutions to help parents filter the material that their little ones are being exposed to on the web. But I didn't find that many open source and simple solutions available online. That's why I decided to explore a couple of different options to solve my web filtering problem: Squid and Dansguardian.

Using only Squid will get you the very basic functionality to allow your younger child to access a pretty limited number of sites. If your kids are a little older, and require a bit more 'freedom' on the World Wide Web, then skip the next section in this article and jump to Using Dansguardian with Squid.

Using only Squid:

I've used Squid to set up my system so that my kids' browsers only access the web addresses that I want them to. Everything else out there is out of reach for them. In the instructions below, I assume that the Squid proxy service will be running on the same computer that the children will be using, but that is not a requirement.

First, let's install Squid on our Fedora system:

su -
yum install -y squid
chkconfig squid on

Next, we edit the file /etc/squid/squid.conf.

1. Find the line on the configuration file with: #Recommendend minimum configuration:

Under that line there will be a few rules starting with the word acl. At the end of the acl block, add the following line:

acl safekids dstdomain .kidsite.com .kidsite2.com

Replace .kidsite.com and .kidsite2.com with a list of the sites you want your children to be able to visit. You can list a full address like: www.kids.com, but then if your child tried to go to a subdomain like games.kids.com, Squid would block it. Add a dot (.) in front of the domain to make a wildcard that will allow any subdomain to go through.

2. Find the line: # INSERT YOUR OWN RULE(S) HERE TO ALLOW ACCESS FROM YOUR CLIENTS

Below that line, find the line that says "http_access allow localhost", and comment it out by adding a '#' in front of it:

# http_access allow localhost

3. Above the line http_access deny all, add:

http_access allow safekids

4. Start Squid service:

service squid start

[Optional] 5. If you are going to use Squid on a separate server, open up port 3128 on your firewall to allow the browser to talk to Squid.

iptables -A INPUT -p tcp -m state --state NEW -m tcp --dport 3128 -j ACCEPT

[Optional] 6. Save your iptables settings so it will persist through reboots

service iptables save

Done. This should have your squid proxy server all set up and running. The major downside of this set up is that it is a lot of manual work to keep a 'whitelist' of allowable sites for your kids to visit, especially as they grow older and start needing to use the Internet for school work.

Using Dansguardian with Squid:

So, what's Dansguardian exactly? It is "software designed to control which websites users can access. It also includes virus filtering and usage monitoring features." [1] In this section of the article, I will show you how to get up and running and interacting with Squid, allowing you to add sites to its banned or exception lists. Dansguardian will use Squid as its way to communicate with the World Wide Web to filter content.

Installing Dansguardian and Squid on Fedora:

yum -y install dansguardian squid
chkconfig dansguardian on
chkconfig squid on
service squid start

Unlike the previous section Using Squid, we can use the default installation of Squid. To get dansguardian working in Fedora, there isn't much work to do either.

First, verify /etc/dansguardian/dansguardian.conf, and make sure you have the following parameters set like this:

# the port that DansGuardian listens to.
filterport = 8080

# the ip of the proxy (default is the loopback - i.e. this server)
proxyip = 127.0.0.1

# the port DansGuardian connects to proxy on
proxyport = 3128

Next start the service:

service dansguardian start

Finally, if you do have firewall rules, open up port 8080 for connection:

iptables -A INPUT -p tcp -m state --state NEW -m tcp --dport 8080 -j ACCEPT 

And to make it persist across reboots:

service iptables save

You should now be able to configure your web browser to connect to port 8080 and use dansguardian as the proxy on your kids accounts. Be aware that dansguardian although less restrictive than just using Squid to do web filtering can still be quite restrictive. If you would like to bypass some of its rules, and open up some sites for your kids, it's quite simple.

Take a look at the /etc/dansguardian/lists directory and get to know all the rules that are set out of the box for dansguardian. If you would like to whitelist a site, edit the file exceptionsitelist and add the site you'd like whitelisted. Once you are done editing the file, bounce dansguardian to load the changes.

service dansguardian restart

Configuring the Client:

Now that we have our server set up, we need to set up the child’s browser to use our dansguardian [or squid] filter:

I will note that this method can be easily be circumvented. I don't recommend it for computer-savvy older kids, but it should work fine for your kindergarten to elementary school aged kids. One could always get fancier and remap ports on the kids machine to directly go to the proxy making it a bit harder for whiz kids to by pass it.

1. Start Firefox (in this case I am using Firefox 2).
2. Go to Edit > Preferences > Advanced.
3. Select the Network Tab.
4. Click "Settings..." under "Connection."

5. Under the new "Connection Settings" window, select "Manual proxy configuration."

6. For HTTP Proxy, enter the IP of your dansguardian server and port 8080 [or 3216 if only using squid]. If your dansguardian (or even squid) service is running locally on the same machine as the browser, use "localhost."
7. Click "OK."
8. Close Firefox Preferences.

Now only the sites that meet dansguardian rules will be allowed in, otherwise your kids will get an out of the box message like the image below.

If you have more than one computer set up to connect to a proxy port other than 8080, like squid's 3128, you can add the following rule to your proxy server to redirect traffic:

iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp --dport 3128 -j REDIRECT --to-port 8080

And then run:

service iptables save

to persist change through reboots.

Overall, this is not a foolproof filter. All you have to do to circumvent it is turn off the manual proxy on the browser, but I hope that with my eight  and ten year olds, I still have a few years to come up with a more robust solution.

Talkback: Discuss this article with The Answer Gang

---

Anderson Silva works as an IT Release Engineer at Red Hat, Inc. He holds a BS in Computer Science from Liberty University, a MS in Information Systems from the University of Maine. He is a Red Hat Certified Engineer working towards becoming a Red Hat Certified Architect and has authored several Linux based articles for publications like: Linux Gazette, Revista do Linux, and Red Hat Magazine. Anderson has been married to his High School sweetheart, Joanna (who helps him edit his articles before submission), for 11 years, and has 3 kids. When he is not working or writing, he enjoys photography, spending time with his family, road cycling, watching Formula 1 and Indycar races, and taking his boys karting,

Picking Fruit

By Ken Starks

Having spent a considerable amount of time as a bachelor, I've learned survival and coping techniques necessary for the lifestyle. I've learned to buy my own clothes without guilt ("you're not wearing THAT, are you?") I've conquered the laundromat, microwave, and DVR... I've even mustered the courage to buy my own food in a supermarket. Exposing testosterone in a female domain can be tricky, but learn I have...

Look helpless long enough and some woman will show you pity and the cereal aisle.

But there is one mystery I have yet to unravel.

Melons.

There they sit in the produce section... piles of them, one on top of another. I have thumped, smelled, hefted, and even squeezed the damned things. Regardless of my efforts, the one I ultimately bring home will have the heart of a concrete slab and taste like cardboard.

Precut and packaged melon has been my most often used option.

If only the rest of my life were so simple.

---

Since 2004, I have been a Linux Advocate. As the founder of The HeliOS Project, I have organized an effort that, to date, has built three learning centers and given away approximately 1,071 computers to kids that cannot afford them. I mention this not to self-promote but to indicate that I have a bit of experience with New Linux Users.

I've come to realize that picking a candidate for Linux conversion is much like picking melons from the supermarket... you can thump and inspect to your heart's content but in reality, not every person is ready for the Free Software harvest.

Let's look at a couple of the most common factors as to why. The first one is the most obvious.

Window Glazed

It's a Microsoft Windows world and I don't think anyone wants to argue that point. Since the advent of Microsoft's last real innovation, Windows 95, most every computer coming off the production line has come pre-installed with Microsoft operating systems. People have learned to use their computers in line with the Redmond Dictate. Let's be honest here: philosophical arguments aside, when Windows is running well, it is a fairly decent way to operate a computer. I mean, sure it allows an unsuspecting user to delete svchost.exe... it even allows a moron to do it multiple times through multiple reinstalls... but aside from full default user control, it works mostly well. Mostly.

People get used to doing things one way. Facing another fact, many in the tech teaching world might agree that about half the people operating a computer today are not computer operators at all... they are task-set mouse clickers. Move one icon from its place or slide a toolbar from bottom to top and many of them will scream "VIRUS"! They have become comfortable with their chosen applications and environments and are loath to step outside of them. Even when you physically show someone another application for the same task, they are often either hesitant or they openly balk at change. To use another application would mean leaving their comfort zone.

God forbid.

There is one factor that can change this... occasionally.

The Pain Threshold

Sometimes, enough is enough. Semi-annual reinstalls and constant losing battles against viruses and spyware can take its toll. However, I've sat down at Windows computers that had 5 or 6 spyware toolbars nestled within Internet Explorer and the owner was clueless as to why his computer was running slow. Many of these people insist "it's the computer". Opening the process dialog and showing them the actual software-based reason for it most often produces glazed-over eyes or blank stares. Seems that seeing anything ending with a file extension can cause discomfort... often it's best not to show them the man behind the curtain.

I know that sounds condescending but we see it more than we'd like to.

Here's the rub...

Many of these people, even if they were willing to try something different, do not know that they have a choice. Even when they do, I've had first-hand experience in guiding people to Linux only to have them tell me that a family member or their "computer friend" said not to bother... that "Linux Sucks".

Door closed.

Like the rinse-lather-repeat behavior of Microsoft Windows doesn't suck?

I don't apologize for the fact that I believe people who refuse to solve their own problems are idiots. I've been criticized often for my lack of bedside manner. Then again, when you have the source of most Internet and computer security problems suggesting that the computing public be taxed to clean up infected machines, it's no wonder they are confused. To many computer users,

Microsoft IS the definitive expert on their computers. This is sad.

In my experience, approximately three out of ten Windows Users in distress will seriously consider making the switch... and I don't necessarily think of those as dismal numbers. In the baseball world, that's equal to batting .300 which can command multi-million dollar annual contracts. I'll take three out of ten.

Peer Pressure

While we've had most success with this in younger people, the fact that one harried Windows User recommends Linux to another harried Windows User has had surprising results. Recently, we installed a Linux computer in a housing project in East Austin. It was a single-parent household with two children who needed a computer. It wasn't two weeks until people from the project were coming over to use that computer to check their email or look something up on the Internet because their Windows computer was hosed.

Go figure.

We've done nine Linux installs in that project to date and they all stemmed from that one initial install. Once people have something to physically compare their current Windows computer to, the job becomes easier.

Pain Threshold indeed.

Kids at school are a big factor in getting us candidates for installs. While the computer gaming crowd isn't going to pay much attention, having a kid brag about his "new system" will. The 3D cube has a lot to do with it, and truth be known, I rarely turn on my extra effects anymore, but with the younger users, it most certainly is a selling point. Add in the Atlantis or Cube Gear plugin and you have an environment that draws them in quickly.

Understanding the Difference

As mentioned above, many New Linux Users are put off or confused by a different environment. They are so used to the blue XP visuals that when presented with a differing screen or menu, they become uncomfortable. I've often mentioned that the absolute worst thing we can do as advocates is to give a new user a Live CD and walk away. Case in point...

A stay-at-home mom was given a CD by one of our directors a couple months back. It was carefully explained to her how to use the CD and what to do in order to get it to boot. When he called her back the next day to check up on her, she complained loudly that Linux wouldn't work for her.

"I put the CD in, I opened the folder and clicked on every icon in the box. Nothing happened."

Sigh.

The Director told her to reboot the computer with the CD in the drawer and it would become apparent what she should do. Nope... the computer BIOS was set to boot to hard drive first. The boot process took her straight into Windows again. When it was further explained that she should hit F12 to change the boot device, she refused.

"If it's that much trouble to use, I don't want to use it."

This is coming from a woman who bitterly complained about the 20 minute update and patch time she had to endure every time she booted her computer into Windows.

This from a woman who had 11 individual viruses or instances of spyware on her machine.

She reported her boot time into a desktop at 6 minutes.

And yeah... sure, most people who sit down at a computer will be able to negotiate the Live CD just fine, but I am consistently amazed at the number of people who cannot. I've found that once you personally sit next to them and show them how it works, their confidence level increases greatly and the chances of them using Linux on a consistent basis is much better.

I fully realize that many people just do not have the time, patience or social skills to sit down and walk a new user through this process but many of us do and that is why I am writing this. Make them comfortable in a new environment and half the battle is won.

Forewarned is forearmed...

Next? Destroying the mental myths of Linux use. Stay tooned... this will be fun.

Talkback: Discuss this article with The Answer Gang

---

Ken Starks is the Founding Director of The HeliOS Project. The HeliOS Project rebuilds computers to current technology standards and gives them to financially disadvantaged children in the Central Texas area. He lives in Austin, Texas and has been active in other projects such as Lindependence and The Tux500 project. Ken is a long-time advocate for the Linux Desktop and has made it the top priority in his life. The HeliOS Project is entering its fifth year in May of 2010 and to date, this effort has provided just over 1000 computers to those that need them most. Ken outlines the mission of his Texas non-profit in simple terms:

"A child's exposure to technology should never be predicated on the ability to afford it."

XKCD

By Randall Munroe

More XKCD cartoons can be found here.

Talkback: Discuss this article with The Answer Gang

---

I'm just this guy, you know? I'm a CNU graduate with a degree in physics. Before starting xkcd, I worked on robots at NASA's Langley Research Center in Virginia. As of June 2007 I live in Massachusetts. In my spare time I climb things, open strange doors, and go to goth clubs dressed as a frat guy so I can stand around and look terribly uncomfortable. At frat parties I do the same thing, but the other way around.

Doomed to Obscurity

By Pete Trbovich

These images are scaled down to minimize horizontal scrolling.

All "Doomed to Obscurity" cartoons are at Pete Trbovich's site, http://penguinpetes.com/Doomed_to_Obscurity/.

Talkback: Discuss this article with The Answer Gang

---

Born September 22, 1969, in Gardena, California, "Penguin" Pete Trbovich today resides in Iowa with his wife and children. Having worked various jobs in engineering-related fields, he has since "retired" from corporate life to start his second career. Currently he works as a freelance writer, graphics artist, and coder over the Internet. He describes this work as, "I sit at home and type, and checks mysteriously arrive in the mail."

He discovered Linux in 1998 - his first distro was Red Hat 5.0 - and has had very little time for other operating systems since. Starting out with his freelance business, he toyed with other blogs and websites until finally getting his own domain penguinpetes.com started in March of 2006, with a blog whose first post stated his motto: "If it isn't fun for me to write, it won't be fun to read."

The webcomic Doomed to Obscurity was launched New Year's Day, 2009, as a "New Year's surprise". He has since rigorously stuck to a posting schedule of "every odd-numbered calendar day", which allows him to keep a steady pace without tiring. The tagline for the webcomic states that it "gives the geek culture just what it deserves." But is it skewering everybody but the geek culture, or lampooning geek culture itself, or doing both by turns?

The Linux Launderette

[[email protected]: Department of Homeland Security]

Ben Okopnik [ben at linuxgazette.net]

Sat, 13 Mar 2010 14:55:12 -0500

Wow, got to give these spammers props for relevance and scope; too bad they're wasting it on such small potatoes. Even their URL is so cute that I'm going to leave it unmangled. The English is quite amusingly mutilated ("has received the prevention", "about the occurred shift", "Earth's figure axis", etc.), but it all makes enough sense that somebody is sure to fall for it. Amazing.

----- Forwarded message from [email protected] -----

Date: 11 Mar 2010 18:19:12 -0000
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Department of Homeland Security

Department of Homeland Security INTELLIGENCE BULLETIN UNCLASSIFIED

11 March 2010

Yesterday the Department of Homeland Security has received the prevention from NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory about the occurred shift of Earth’s figure axis:

The recent Chilean earthquake shifted the axis by approximately three inches and shortened the length of a day by 1.26 microseconds. According to NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory the displacement of Earth’s axis will cause natural disasters on the Eastern coast of the USA including Florida, Georgia, South and North Carolina.

In this connection the DHS has made a decision to prepare for general evacuation from the specified area. The population of the region should be ready for evacuation. It is necessary collect valuable possessions, documents, things of first necessity, and wait for the announcement.

In order to prevent panic among the population DHS asks to stay calm and follow the official instructions listed below:

http://dhsorg.org/docs/instructions.zip

U.S. Department of Homeland Security Washington, DC 20528

----- End forwarded message -----

-- 
* Ben Okopnik * Editor-in-Chief, Linux Gazette * http://LinuxGazette.NET *

---

Phoneutoo spam

Neil Youngman [ny at youngman.org.uk]

Mon, 1 Mar 2010 15:59:33 +0000

I assume this is a targeted spam, not an official Gazette communications channel?

"Linux Gazette has added you to their group, using Phone U Too, so you can begin receiving important voice and email notifications related to Linux Gazette."

[ Thread continues here (11 messages/12.25kB) ]

---

Talkback: Discuss this article with The Answer Gang